This evening at 7 p.m., the Planning & Zoning Commission will hold its first meeting since July 24, kicking off what promises to be a busy fall. If you’ve lost track of the many residential projects proposed within Wilton Center and along Danbury Rd., GOOD Morning Wilton will have a special report coming soon that looks at what’s approved, what’s still in contention, and what’s on the horizon in the coming months.  

However, what is less certain are details on the Greater Wilton Center Area Master Plan, the ambitious project that kicked off in December 2021. A subcommittee — led by P&Z Chair Rick Tomasetti, along with other representatives from the Commission as well as the Village District Design Advisory Committee, the Inland Wetlands Commission, and local architect Barbara Geddis — was enlisted to help see the process through.

Officials envisioned redesigning Wilton Center’s zoning regulations as the first in a series of neighborhood master plans that would one day tackle Georgetown and Cannondale as well. The Board of Selectmen voted in 2021 to approve starting that process. That original contract with consultant BFJ Planning set October 2022 as the deadline to deliver a new zoning code for the area to the town.

Today, the project seems poised to run at least one full year behind schedule.

Delays and Problems

The effort came under fire publicly beginning in December 2022, when local architect Rich Granoff proposed a four-story, 32-unit multi-family residential complex for 12 Godfrey Pl. in Wilton Center. With Granoff seeming to bristle at the Commission’s expectations that his project be put on pause until the conclusion of the master plan process, his attorney Liz Suchy said on Dec. 12, “Two weeks is one thing, six months is a whole other ballgame. I’m not trying to be cute or condescending, but we need to move this ahead.”

Tomasetti himself pushed back on the idea that the new regulations were as far as six months away, replying that they would be available “by the end of this year [2022].”

When P&Z meets this evening, nine months will have passed since that exchange.

Granoff went on to resubmit the project as a larger, less aesthetically-designed 8-30g affordable housing proposal, which P&Z reluctantly approved in June, facing the specter of a costly and hopeless litigation process. Earlier in the spring, the subcommittee committed to weekly meetings “from now until it’s done,” citing the growing number of applications for development within Wilton Center. Later, the group announced that despite the usual summer recess, the subcommittee would continue to meet in the month of August. The minutes of July 20 state that: “The goal remains to be to have a public meeting in early September. Two meetings with the consultants in August.”

However, those meetings shifted from weekly to sporadic almost immediately, and in August, with no future meetings appearing on the public town agenda, GOOD Morning Wilton reached out repeatedly to Town Planner Michael Wrinn (beginning on Aug. 7) and Tomasetti (beginning on Aug. 30) seeking any update on the master plan process. We received no response, and as of publication, no master plan meetings appear to be scheduled for the month of September either.

Regarding the promised public meeting on the zoning proposals, little is known. As reported by GOOD Morning Wilton, during the Oct. 21, 2021 BOS meeting when the contract with BFJ was approved, Selectman Ross Tartell said from a “community involvement perspective” it is important that “the public will have an opportunity to contribute, and that will help them feel like they’ve been heard.” He was assured by Wrinn that there would be multiple occasions for the public to participate in the process.

However, nearly two years in, the sum of public engagement opportunities has been a single, two-hour workshop held 18 months ago in March 2022. And although the initial schedule presented by BFJ Planning included three separate public engagements events (scheduled for Months 4, 7, and 10, in what was then a 10-month process), the second of those engagement opportunities appears to have been eliminated.

The original schedule laying out three public hearings (shown as green squares in the second to last row in the chart below) still appears on the town’s Wilton Center Area Master Plan website, albeit with a note that says only two will be hosted. The Get Involved page of the same site still lists the March 2022 workshop under “Upcoming Events.”

So what is the status of the long-awaited Wilton Center master plan? Perhaps we’ll learn more tonight.

The Monday, Sept. 11 meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission begins at 7 p.m.; the agenda is available on the town website and the public can view the meeting live via zoom.

Join the Conversation


  1. Well in the meantime, it’s certainly provided a convenient excuse for delaying action on new housing projects in the hope that they’ll go away. (and then for getting all pouty and indignant when developers respond to that bad-faith dissembling by plowing forward with 8-30g)

    So if they ever do release it, they’re just going to have to turn and come up with some other excuse for putting off approvals instead – maybe they’ll form a committee on earthquake-proofing or something, and insist that all new housing construction has to be able to withstand a 7.5-Richter-scale earthquake of the sort that are constantly plaguing Connecticut.

  2. The delay can probably be attributed to biting off more than they could chew. It wasn’t just a new Town Center Masterplan, but also adding a Form-Based Code Overlay. After all, it’s a massive amount of work for a bunch of unpaid volunteers that still had to sit in and prepare for regular Public Meetings for their respective Boards or Commissions on top of this special planning effort. And do all this within the original timeline. This was something that should have been planned over multiple years, with at least 2 public input sessions per year to keep public interest going, with an overall framework put in place first year that would not hinder current applications and then dial it down into detailed studies per area of priority that offered planning guidance for future development or alteration of existing properties, with grace periods to avoid situations like 12 Godfrey.

    But, I don’t think the P&Z bears the full blunt of the blame, it is both the consultant planning firm who probably thought this was an easy project since they worked on it 20 years ago but then it wasn’t, and the Board of Selectmen who dropped the ball for not allocating enough resources to an effort that had early warning signs of falling behind. They could have canvassed more volunteers or split the Town Center Planning Committee in different areas of interest to work in parallel (and thus, faster), with the paid BFJ firm coordinating the volunteer effort.

Leave a comment
IMPORTANT: GMW requires commenters to use FULL, real, verifiable names and emails. Comments with pseudonyms, first names only, initials, etc. will NOT be approved. If you do not provide your FULL name, GMW will NOT publish your comment. (Email addresses will not be published.) Please refer to GMW's Terms of Use for our's full commenting and community engagement policy. Comments violating these terms will not be published at the discretion of GMW editors/staff. Comment approval may take up to 24 hours (sometimes longer). If your comment has not been approved by then, refer to the policy above before emailing GMW.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.